.png)
BASTROP — City Council narrowly approved the first reading of an ordinance expanding work restrictions on certain convicted sex offenders, capping weeks of debate over how the rules should be written.
Council voted 3-2 June 9 in favor of the amendment, which builds on an existing ordinance barring sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of places where children gather. The new rules would extend that restriction to employment for offenders classified as moderate or high risk of reoffending whose convictions involved a minor victim.
“Reclusion zones are modern-day banishment,” Resident David Chamber said during public comment. “The ordinance before you restricts where people may live, work and be present in the community. Calling those restrictions non-punitive does not change their practical effect.”
The amendment includes a grandfather clause for covered offenders already employed at a qualified business as of the ordinance’s effective date, provided they remain continuously employed and compliant with registration requirements. An appeals process and hardship exemption process would allow caseby- case consideration of unique circumstances.
A second reading is required before the law takes effect.
Council members John Kirkland and Kerry Fossler voted against the amendment over concerns with the grandfather clause’s wording, despite supporting the ordinance’s original intent. Fossler said the language was too targeted, while Kirkland said portions of the clause raised constitutional concerns related to due process.
Councilwoman Cynthia Meyer said her focus remained on community safety.
“The ramifications I’m worried about is if we don’t do something to protect our community and our citizens,” Meyer said. “My concern is the greatest protection we can give our citizens, especially the most vulnerable ones.” Megan Webb, CEO of the Children’s Advocacy Center, said the ordinance reflects an effort to balance public safety with reintegration.
“I think too often these discussions become framed as an all-or-nothing debate,” Webb said. “In reality, good public policy requires nuance and balance and careful consideration of all the competing interests.”
