Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.
Time to read
4 minutes
Read so far

Education organizations request rejection of new charter school campuses

Posted in:

September 3, 2020

Dear Chairman Ellis and Members of the State Board of Education:

On behalf of the 20 education organizations listed below, we appreciate your work to support public education throughout this pandemic. We understand that our state’s economy is in a recession and that state revenue projections are gloomy. To that end, we wanted to ask you to address an issue that could exacerbate the state’s budget crisis, harm school districts, and send Texas tax dollars out of state.

On Friday, September 11, the SBOE will consider awarding eight new charter awards that include 18 new charter school campuses. We respectfully ask that the SBOE consider the incremental cost of the applicants’ 18 new campuses—and their potential future expansions—in the context of the mounting cost of charter expansions. Approving this slate of charters could cost Texas school districts an estimated $750 million in revenue and send about $61 million Texas tax dollars to California, Florida, and New York corporations over ten years. Coupled with troubling issues in these charters’ applications, we ask for a pause on new awards.

Additional State Cost for Charter Enrollment: Each student who leaves a school district to enroll in a charter school costs the state, on average, $1,150 more, because charter schools have a much higher entitlement level than most school districts in which they operate. The higher cost to the Foundation School Program if the SBOE approves the award of eight new charters would be about $12 million annually when the charters reach capacity (and more if these charters in three years obtain expansions at the sole discretion of the Commissioner). In their first ten years, these eight new charters would cost the state an estimated $88 million more than if students enrolled in school districts.

Massive Charter Expansions: That incremental higher cost must be understood in the context of massive expansions already approved this year. Thus far in 2020, the Commissioner has approved existing charter schools’ expansion amendments for 49 new charter campuses (more campuses than Alief ISD) and is considering 27 more campuses for IDEA Public Schools despite unresolved financial oversight issues. Additionally, the Commissioner increased existing charters’ maximum enrollment capacity by 18,450 students (approximately $20 million higher state cost per year) and is still considering IDEA’s request to increase its maximum enrollment capacity by 34,785 students (which would obligate state cost by an additional $38 million per year).

If the Commissioner and SBOE in 2020 approve all pending expansions (amendments and new applications), Texans will pay for a staggering 94 new charter campuses—which is the equivalent of adding more campuses than Lubbock ISD and Waco ISD combined—in only one year. This is a 64,381 increase in maximum student capacity, which is like adding a new Aldine ISD, at an incremental higher state cost of $70 million annually above the cost of enrolling these students in school districts.

State Budget Cost Driver: These pending actions have the potential to be a major cost driver for the state budget into the future. The 2020 charter expansions are in addition to TEA’s prior approvals in 2010–19 of 736 new campuses, most of which were approved in the past five years. Adding in all potential 2020 expansions to existing maximum capacity, the more than 640,000 charter seats would equate to $700 million annually in additional tax dollars—just to subsidize the higher cost of charter schools.

Harm to School Districts: We urge that you veto or limit approval of all new charters this year, not only as a financially prudent way to reduce additional new obligations on the state budget, but also as a way to avoid harming Texas school districts that are struggling in this unprecedented pandemic era. Texas school districts could lose an estimated $101.5 million annually in revenue when these eight charters and their 18 campuses reach capacity (based on average per-student revenue loss).

Texas Tax Dollars to California, Florida, and New York: Regarding the eight new charters, $21 million in state funds would go out of state in the first five years to private charter management organizations (CMOs). Learn4Life and Rocketship would pay CMOs in California 15 percent of revenues, while Doral would pay $750 per student to a Florida-affiliated CMO and another one percent of revenues just for trademark usage to another Florida CMO. Brillante would pay its New York-based CMO eight percent plus a $700 per-student facility lease. Out-of-state management fees exceed $61 million in the first ten years.

Charter Applicant Operations and Finances Raise Red Flags: In-depth research on the new charter applicants reveals troubling information not included in the charter applications. The California and Florida chains, in particular, should raise red flags with previous investigations, conflicts of interest, lawsuits, school closures, low graduation rates, and failure to serve certain student populations, as detailed on fact sheets that we have available. For example:

Learn4Life’s CMO in 2017 paid its CEO $702,008 and three family members $926,234, for a total of more than $1.6 million. While Learn4Life’s application lists seven high-paid California CMO executives for “instructional leadership,” it lists five Texas teachers for 200 students its first year.

Rocketship schools in California have annual teacher attrition rates as high as 59 percent. To address continuing operating shortfalls at both the school and CMO level, the Rocketship CMO deferred $8.8 million in rent payments and management fees to future years. Rocketship also reported $12.5 million in “intercompany” and “long-term” loans.

Doral contracts management services to Academica (through affiliate Academica SW), a for-profit Florida-based organization. Academica was the subject of a U.S. Department of Education Office of Inspector General investigation that found related-party transactions between Academica and a real estate company that leased both buildings and security services to the schools.

New Charters are Not Needed: Although Texas public schools have had tremendous enrollment growth, that growth recently has slowed. The potential one-year addition of 64,381 charter seats exceeds the enrollment growth of all Texas public schools last year; meanwhile, charter schools currently have hundreds of thousands of seats in excess capacity.

Many of the eight new charters propose to locate in the boundaries of high-performing school districts. This does not make sense financially or academically. Also, communities have shown little interest at most applicants’ public meetings but have shown high amounts of opposition because of the harm to existing public schools.

The eight new charters are estimated to cost the state $88 million more and cost school district revenue $750 million over ten years. We would appreciate your vote to veto all or some of the new charter awards. Please contact representatives of any of the organizations that signed on to this letter if you have questions.

 

The following 20 organizations endorse the comments in this letter:

  • Association of Texas Professional Educators
  • Texas State Teachers Association/National Education Association
  • Texas American Federation of Teachers
  • Texas Classroom Teachers Association
  • Texas Association of School Boards
  • Raise Your Hand Texas
  • Texas Association of School Administrators
  • Texas School Alliance
  • Texas Association of Community Schools
  • Fast Growth School Coalition
  • Texas Rural Education Association
  • Texas Elementary Principals and Supervisors Association
  • Texas Association of Midsize Schools
  • Texas Association of Rural Schools
  • Pastors for Texas Children
  • Intercultural Development Research Association
  • Every Texan
  • Coalition for Education Funding
  • Texas Association of Latino Administrators and Superintendents
  • Texas Urban Council of Superintendents

 

The Texas State Board of Education approved five of the eight proposed new charter schools on September 11.

Elgin ISD Superintendent Jodi Duron serves as the legislative chair for the Texas Association of School Administrators, and Elgin ISD is a member of the Texas Association of Midsize Schools, the Texas Association of Community Schools and the Texas Association of School Boards.